Originally Posted by
mduell
The sCO 757s are even worse than the sUA ones. Stats for the last 2 weeks:
Code:
carrier | fleet | on_time_departure_percent
---------+-------+---------------------------
sUA | A319 | 86
sUA | A320 | 84
sCO | B735 | 90
sCO | B737 | 86
sCO | B738 | 85
sCO | B739 | 83
sUA | B744 | 76
sCO | B752 | 79
sUA | B752 | 85
sCO | B753 | 83
sCO | B762 | 79
sUA | B763 | 79
sCO | B764 | 69
sCO | B772 | 73
sUA | B772 | 85
On time performance evens out across the fleet on the arrival side:
Code:
carrier | fleet | on_time_arrival_percent
---------+-------+-------------------------
sUA | A319 | 85
sUA | A320 | 85
sCO | B735 | 90
sCO | B737 | 86
sCO | B738 | 86
sCO | B739 | 84
sUA | B744 | 77
sCO | B752 | 81
sUA | B752 | 83
sCO | B753 | 82
sCO | B762 | 73
sUA | B763 | 75
sCO | B764 | 81
sCO | B772 | 74
sUA | B772 | 78
I assume that chart doesn't take into account wx delays. sCO birds fly more often from EWR which is more congested than sUA hubs. Combine that with the European snow where a bunch of the sCO 752s would be leaving from on their way back TATL.