Originally Posted by
84fiero
... Especially since it doesn't seem to be rocket science to fix. If the site was fine before their page changes (which are inconsequential window dressing anyway), and if for some reason they don't have the ability to fix it properly, why not revert to the old version then? Instead of superficial layout changes, spend the time to improve the search function, for one example?
Maybe for them, looks is more important than what's inside, after seeing how IB prioritizing "improvement" on FT?
The sad thing is they can't even get the looks part right.