Originally Posted by
Dan72
The naiveté was not in the analysis of the market impact of the proposed transaction, but rather the implied point that it was a CEO's role to play a part in defending free and fair competition.
There was no (at least certainly no intended) such implication in what I wrote. I was simply reacting to the fact that BA and FR believe that their proposed arrangement believe it would make it more likely for competition authorities to accept FR's project (as per the OP which I was quoting), which, to me, shows that they do not understand very well what these authorities look for when assessing a bid.