FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - The future of travel
View Single Post
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 11:32 am
  #24  
Flubber2012
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 523
Originally Posted by pinniped
It took the post to be more of a concern that an airline with the Spirit/Ryanair model could establish a national footprint and a big enough presence in reservation systems that some people would have no choice but to book it.

Say two or three carriers go to an extreme fee model. Spirit grows over the course of a decade, Ryanair America arrives and gets huge, and a carrier like US, being the 4th legacy, decides to break from the pricing model of the big three and shoot for something in the middle. Assume for this argument that these carriers all decide to list fares in a reservation system that your company can access.

Then you go to query, say, CHI-WAS for your business trip.

You corporate system returns the following, all nonstop and in your time range:
- Spirit, $20
- Ryanair, $30
- US Airways, $100
- United, $150

Assume the reality of your travel is that you'd be hit with a mix of fees that effectively made all four of them $150.

I interpreted what timfountain was saying is that if they're all the same at the end of the day, he should be allowed to pick United...but the system would only see the base fare and force him into the Spirit cesspool.

I point out a hope (whether founded or not) that big firms will still strike corporate discounts with big airlines like United that can extend some level of discounting throughout a huge alliance, so maybe the system would still allow the "preferred" carrier to be booked.

I didn't take it as a 1K/DYKWIA thing.
I didn't interpret it that way but, assuming that in this hypothetical example, if the business traveler had to buy up to the $150 ticket anyway, wouldn't the travel experience be similar since you'd be getting bells and whistles on Cheap-O-Air?
Flubber2012 is offline