Originally Posted by
BigFlyer
Which goes back to the original question I asked.
I see the public policy rationale for having a "trusted traveler" program, which is what Clear was originally supposed to be. However, when the TSA ultimately did not allow a different inspection for Clear members as Clear initially promised, it became a program where you simply pay money to cut the line.
I assume that it is because of the initial "trusted traveler" idea that Clear still has the biometric looking checkpoints, even though that level or security really serves no purpose.
I don't see the public policy rationale for allowing some people to pay money to a private company to cut the line for a governmental service.
The airlines have special OLCI and Kiosk offers that alllow non status Y pax the opportunity to use elite lines, including security check points.. What's the difference?
BTW, I pity the fool in SFO that pays UA $40 for the use of the premier line...... That line can be three times worse than the regular line