First, my vote was to change the name. So I personally thought a name change would be beneficial and helpful, especially to newer members.

With that said, in my head, I tend to view a name change as a fairly "big" thing. As such, I was looking for at least a 2/3rds or larger margin wanting change. Had the "no change" group been around 30% or less of the total, then I might be thinking lets look at how the pro-name change options went. Since that didn't happen, I agree with Bruce, I just don't see a big ground-swelling for a name change.