Originally Posted by
Boggie Dog
It has been said that Corbet cannot present evidence in the appeals court. If true then what kind of justice is that?
What evidence? If evidence related to the nudi scope then that is correct - it should not have been heard. If evidence related to why he should be able to file in FL rather than in DC that is a different matter.
Issue is one of jurisdiction not of the merits of his complaint. Corbett wanted it in the 11th Circuit Court so that the case could be heard by a jury. Corbett evens says that:
“That’s the bad news. The good news is that the fight is not over. It simply must be continued without that jury, and with discovery and witnesses allowed to me at the discretion of the 11th Circuit.”
Corbett will refile in DC and continue his fight. That said once he refiles I have no idea what evidence he may or may not present at the DC Appeals court.