FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - EHD swabs and "false" detections
View Single Post
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 10:30 am
  #24  
chollie
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 49,085
Originally Posted by gsoltso
There is a difference between a sterile location such as a hospital, and a checkpoint in an airport, recognizing that, and the fact that sometimes cross contamination is going to happen in the airport setting is merely facing a reality.
I realize you don't make the rules. I also realize that the common sense you exhibit is not always present at checkpoints.

As you point out, a checkpoint is anything but sterile and cross-contamination can happen (it can also happen in a so-called 'sterile' environment - witness recent events in a quarantined government facility where a dangerous 'superbug' got loose).

IMHO, when a test is positive, it should be standard procedure to immediately rerun the test with explicit attention to the possibility of contamination - ie, TSO removes gloves, sanitizes hands, gets a new set of gloves from a different box/location, tests gloves in machine, if clear, swabs pax and re-tests.

This should, IMHO, be the first step after any 'positive'. It's the sort of 'first step' many professionals in other lines of work take when a test comes up positive. The 'first step' should not be to force the pax into a mandatory backroom unwitnessed, unphotographed frisk of body and belongings, accompanied by a report on the pax that becomes a permanent part of a that individual's government record.
chollie is offline