Originally Posted by
rwmiller56
They're saying the redundant system failed to kick in. I didn't realize the SHARES mainframe could support a redundant interface. It's tough to do redundancy with only one (1) serial port.
Originally Posted by
shortkidd
This was reported yesterday. I call this push the blame onto something else but their own faults. I'm surprised they didn't blame it on their outsourcing partner EDS.
They wouldn't dare blame it on EDS, because EDS is probably why they're using SHARES in the first place -- there's that Texas connection between EDS and CO after all.