FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Copenhagen, Denmark vs. Malmo, Sweden
View Single Post
Old Aug 16, 2012 | 12:19 am
  #3  
Thalassa
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Finland
Programs: Almost anything with six to twelve steps...
Posts: 1,034
Originally Posted by rack him
For those of you that have been to both Copenhagen and Malmo, do you have a preference for which city to stay in overnight? I have read that it takes only about 15 minutes by rail to travel between these two cities, so not sure if one is preferable to the other if visiting both cities (and their respective countries). Any thoughts? Thanks.
Copenhagen is the larger and more international city of the two; Malmö is smaller and more regional. Putting the two into your local (or so I presume) context is asking whether you'd like to stay in Seattle or Tacoma.

ADDED: if anyone finds my Seattle/Tacoma comparison puzzling, it is. I mixed up the OP with the first responder who is Seattle-based. The more sensible comparison for the OP would have been San Francisco vs. Oakland (or San Jose).

Cheers,
T.

Last edited by Thalassa; Aug 18, 2012 at 6:16 am Reason: A clarification added
Thalassa is offline