Originally Posted by
tuolumne
The Continental reputation was a lot of hot air, carefully crafted in a PR vacuum. It seems even as this is finally being revealed, there are still some who are trying to figure out a way to save a legacy that never existed.
As we see almost the entire C suite coming from the CO side, and the combined entitled adopting CO's computer system and associated policies and procedures, your comments are puzzling to me. How is the current performance of the company not then directly a result of said changes?
Funny the comments by some posters here and I quote "UA was infintely better than CO" sounds more like hot air. I mean to state factually that CO was not good and then state that UA was the best thing since sliced bread is the issue I find in this forum.
Once again the PMUAers here are offered an olive branch (regarding sentiments to the current state of the carrier) only to douse the branch in jet fuel, set it on fire and say PMCO did it.