Originally Posted by
UA-NYC
This is a pretty substantial and absolute statement. Do you have support?
Let's be clear: UA has already announced monthly PRASM performance for 2Q, and is likely to follow up with mediocre-to-poor quarterly results. Attacking a poster for commenting on such is either ignorant or an intentional attempt to undermine the credibility of a poster.
When revenue performance for the quarter has already been reported, I find it legitimate to question why you would allege that UA management is withholding information and that, "potentially damaging Q2 PRASM figure being released soon..."
This is a distinctly different statement/position than discussing expectations for quarterly results. I didn't think that questioning the validity and basis of a specific statement/position constitutes a attack and I apologize if you took it personally.