Originally Posted by
dgcpaphd
Shortsightedness also includes the failure or inability to "connect the dots" in order to see the entire set of facts.
When one does view the total facts, rather than just pieces and phrases, the class action makes perfect sense.
It is unlikely the attorney for the plaintiff would have taken on this case if there were no actionable behavior on the part of UA.
Based on what you wrote, one might assume that you are the judge assigned to this case.
Until the case is brought before a judge or dismissed, your comment has no foundation and is merely an opinion.
The attorney for the plaintiff has extensive class action experience. He has success against some of the largest companies in the U.S.
I suggest you wait for the outcome before being so certain that the plaintiff "has no case."
-
A judge can determine if the airline engaged in deception. If they did not by revealing ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS and if the customer AGREED to those terms and conditions, the contract is not violated. If the customer did not read the entire contract, the customer is at fault for agreeing without knowing what he is agreeing to.