Originally Posted by
steve_w
So, someone raises some possibly valid criticisms (that tally with my own experience) and instead of some reasoned answers everyone points and laughs because hey, the silly girlie writes freelance for a paper that's not blue in flavour, has a blog and uses twitter?
No. It is rather than the compalint is insubstantial and the fact that it is a journalist making it does not endow it with any additional substance.
If anything, that makes it even weaker as you would expect a journalist to make at least an effort to inform themselves before publishing something and she singularly failed to do so. In this latter respect, it is a bit like a doctor that could not distinguish between colon cancer and a broken foot.