Originally Posted by
seanthepilot
I will spell out my feelings.
Apple products, their MP3 players, phones, and tablets do little of what I need them to do, and all kinds of things I don't need. In fact, my Nokia, Samsung, and Acer products do all the things I need quite well. I don't need to pay more for a product that meets less of my needs.
Your opinions are not going to change Apple's company policy, and their products will still fail to match my needs. Android is the most popular operating system and, even if the spend per user is less, it still adds up to a lot of revenue.
Some of us technology users came here for a discussion. Not to WIN the discussion, just to participate in it. If you simply need to win the argument, then OMNI is the correct place to take that behaviour.
Sensitive much?
Please point out where I am trying to "win" the discussion. I simply pointed out very basic business facts about why a company would not be willing to spend sparse resources on an expense app with limited return potential. Explain your "feelings" all you want, how about "discussing" the actual post? Then you can rightly claim to be one of those "technology users" who is actually here for a discussion.
I use both an iPhone and an Android phone, both daily. I have experience with both, with the software and the app stores. All of which is much more than many here can say, many who have only touched either device in a casual way, but not as a daily user. I believe that gives me the perspective to discuss either device. I have a preference for one over the other, but that doesn't cloud my opinion of basic business sense.