FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Question: "Low fares, 5 clear (as mud) options" yet another 'Tango fare' thread
Old May 2, 2012 | 10:35 am
  #6  
UK_Canuck
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LHR, YYZ
Programs: AC25K
Posts: 76
Originally Posted by yeg2where
Consensus opinion seems to be "because we can"
Exactly.... My issue is that the level of service doesn't change within the same bucket. At least the previous couple of years the difference between W and M wasn't too bad (I once got it for $100 extra on a YYZ->LHR leg), now you are looking at 2x(or more) to get to the highest T+ fare. And the *only* advantage there is the potential to upgrade with fewer credits, which is not guaranteed.

If M got you something more than W as an incentive and the fewer upgrade credits were a bonus should your upgrade clear, then I might consider it, but it just doesn't seem justifiable any more.
UK_Canuck is offline