(against all my instincts to not prolong a debate that doesn't seem to be going anywhere), no - the camaraderie shouldn't and will not change any bit due to a mere name change. But is that reason enough to justify the new name? I guess it just boils down to how people tend to associate a set of words with something bigger though intangible over a period of time.. and a seemingly undemocratic/sudden change don't make things easy

Thanks for asking! Always appreciated an earnest question over a sarcastic retort.