Originally Posted by
Dr. HFH
From the April 5, 2012 Weekly Hotline of the APFA:
Actually the US FA contract rejection probably is not an impediment to Doug Parker. He currently is operating 2 carriers under a single brand and marketing and then coordinating scheduling and partners across the two carriers. Why would he find operating 3 carriers (HP, US, & AA) under the AA brand problematic? To a rational person that might seem like a circus act, but that doesn't mean he isn't crazy enough do it or creditors spooked enough to approve it. Even if AA isn't able to lower its costs, he would get what he wants - the AA network along with the newer aircraft. He would transfer flying to HP and US, while reducing flying by legacy AA crews. He will discard the MD-80s as part of the acquisition, dump current AA management, and gradually downsize the number of AA rank and file. I suspect that the rhetoric between AA management and the rank and file is such that unsecured creditors may assume that labor contracts that both parties can agree to won't happen and without US, the only other option is an Eastern / Braniff style dismantling breakup. Never confuse logic and business
