<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by nako:
I have to agree. Sadly, though, I'm not sure that will ever happen.
I'm sick and f*cking tired of reading partisan potshots from both sides - whether it be about Bush supporters either being "sheep" or "drinking Fox News Kool Aid," or just generally being referred to as idiotic (arguments that I am personally offended by, on several levels) or similar statements being dished from the other side. The statements themselves are galling enough - OMNI is full of people who feel that their idea of debate is spewing hate and personal attacks in order to further their own agenda.
What saddens me more, however, is that people sit back and let it happen. I could sit and cry foul about being personally offended by many statements in OMNI - yet I'm not sure that anyone would really give a ****. And I'm certain that I'm not the only one who feels that way.
Mike
[This message has been edited by nako (edited Jan 13, 2004).]</font>
I could easily say this appears to be an attack on the the people who DO NOT support Bush? By describing at length what galls your side and scarcely mentioning the other. ( all the while trying to give the "fair and balanced" appearance)
You are not claiming your own posts are mostly non-partisan are you?
Personally I really don care whether ONMI exists or not I browse it ocasionally but I didnt bother to apply for posting privilages.. keeps me out (partially anyway) of flame wars.
As I see it almost impossible to prevent members from expressing their opinions on many/most subjects and its going to grate on some others nerves.. that life.
mike
[This message has been edited by MIKESILV (edited Jan 13, 2004).]