<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by MapleLeaf:
Originally posted by cattle:
Why does he have to answer to you if he has asked his boss a question? We might vote on FT but Randy is the ultimate owner and boss and the buck stops with him, not you the last time I checked.</font>
I have never stated I was his boss. Common courtesy dictates that one address an answer to the person who asks the question - unless of course you have something to hide.
Oh yeah, it was not a personal attack. I know of fellow FT'rs who were "un-subscribed" from special offers posted in the Starwood forum because Starwood Lurker tracked them down by their e-mail and removed them from the promotion. It is that behavious which has made me stay away from their properties - plus 4 really bad experiences in a row at their properties.
I find your statement pretty hard to believe and I wonder if its based on a personal dislike (for SPG??)
If you would did or could or care to spend some time on the Starwood forum you would find out quite easily that by all appearances the Lurker cannot register or unregister individuals for promos as he so fancies.
But dont let truth get in the way of your goals.
However to accuse him ( or any of a number lurkers on these boards) of doing what you said what he has been is a new low ( but not surprising after a cursary glance at the AC forum)
If i were accused thusly I wouldnt hesitate to tell FTalk to piss-off.
However unless I am presented with much more evidence than your heresay I dont buy it, if you have any at all which I highly doubt, since I am pretty certain you dont work for Starwood.
Just stick to the topic at hand and save us the smear campaign.
mike
[This message has been edited by MIKESILV (edited Dec 04, 2003).]