<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Rssrsvp:
Folks, as an impartial observer, as I never frequent a Starwood property, I would like to make the following suggestion. In a court of law after the attorneys for both sides have made their arguments, the case is either handed over to the judge or the jury. In this case both the judge and jury are Randy. You can beat this issue to death, or step back and wait for Randy to give his decision. Nothing can be accomplished by this continued back and forth bickering except alienate people. </font>
It sounds as if all the facts had not been presented yet, though. MapleLeaf's statement that Starwood Lurker had
indeed tracked down a Flyertalk member based on information that member had revealed here is new evidence that was introduced in this case
(in case anyone has not noticed, I am just playing along). Even though Starwood Lurker took the fifth, I think it was a valuable contribution that the information contained in the witness'(MapleLeaf's) statement was presented to the jury
.