Someone just emailed me, referring me to Randy's post above, and berated me for not 'copping it sweet'. For the public record I agreed entirely with Randy's actions, posted here a week or more back that I agreed, and advised Randy by return I had no problem at all with any of it, and apologised that these flames etc had intruded into his busy schedule. So whomever "argued the toss" about his decision, whether this week or last, it was NOT oztamps. And also for the record Randy took that action before a couple of well known FT'ers said goodbye, which I do not feel is widely understood or appreciated by most.

I feel "naming names" is not anyone else's business here. A quick "search" by user name for last 5 days in their "home" Forum will readily pinpoint predictable absentees to the overly curious. It is hardly rocket science.

This figure from Randy really amazes me: "some 900+ members with roughly 2814 total multiple user names". None of those were or are me, so on top of the seperate email address user names that myself and a number of others fessed up to in 2000, the problem is far larger than anyone here ever imagined I suspect.

------------------
~ Glen ~

[This message has been edited by ozstamps (edited 03-13-2001).]