"...entirely for satirical purposes..." ?????? Please!

I guess it depends on ones definition of "satire!" As was noted previously:

"As the likely most frequently flamed individual on FT ever, I certainly agree with motnot- except perhaps for the humor issue, since it is manifestly in the eye of the beholder. Some may actually well find secondary and tertiary "handles" useful for "humor," yet it is a fact that many a true word is spoken in jest and that the "humor" at the expense of others should ideally have no true place in any real caring "community!"

Are these handles and their posts examples of "humor?"

cod
quack
Dr Pfp
Doctor PfP
Reverend PfP
Miss PfP
Karl Stevens
And on, and on, and on...

I think not!"
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum1/HTML/003825.html


"I will give all threads on this board careful consideration as to their merits of the spirit and intent of this board."

Again, thanks for trying to best "protect" the interests of ALL involved Randy!

And Happy Holidays too!

[This message has been edited by doc (edited 12-15-2000).]