I find it repulsive to pay for a subscription to a magazine that Randy is the publisher / editor of and has us believe that he is unbiased.
I have yet to see any evidence to support that Randy is unbiased. There is also the option of cancelling your subscription if you feel repulsed.
All we ask for is if he is going to comment or give us advice. We asked him for nothing more, although we would like his help.
True. You are asking. Just realize that you may ask and not receive. Randy may choose to remain silent on this matter. Perhaps he is waiting for his sources at DL to get back to him? Perhaps he knows of changes that are about to be announced and has chosen to wait? Who knows? That is his decision. My opinion is that Randy will respond to this thread. I, too, look forward to his response. I just don't demand it. I am in no position to do so, magazine subscriber or not.
If you have a problem with this, stop reading the thread!
I read this thread because I DO have an interest in the changes at DL. If you wish your communications with Randy to be private, he has posted his email address.
Do people have to get nasty to get a reply from Randy?
I have never known or heard this to be the case.
Please do not take my comments the wrong way. I am just as interested in the DL changes as many of you. But I am in agreement with Dorian's earlier comment in that I see Randy as the owner of this public forum. I don't, however, see where Randy has "promised" us any personal attention or consultation.