FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - UA Has Filed for DCA-SFO!
View Single Post
Old Feb 29, 2012 | 7:52 am
  #93  
eponymous_coward
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,244
Originally Posted by sinoflyer

By contrast, BOS is the only game in town. Also, there is likely no viable market for 3-class service on BOS-LAX/SFO, so I agree with you that p.s. simply doesn't belong there. But let's not forget that p.s. will soon convert to 2-class. That's where I see the inroad for it on DCA-SFO. I am, however, still somewhat on the fence on the idea, being 51/49 for/against it.
I tend to think it won't, for simple reasons: what makes DCA more prone to supporting high fares than any transcon outstation, like, say, EWR-SAN or SFO-MIA? And why isn't that market served by just having folks buy tickets on three-class planes on SFO-IAD?

And before you say: "it's DCA, limited supply"; I think the proper market's WAS, not DCA. Loads of supply there.

Also, if anything, there's an entire class of people who'll want to fly that route who cannot buy C fares: government employees flying on the public dime. And UA doesn't fly p.s. on transcon such as to give it away; that's the entire point of shrinking the p.s. cabin when they go from 3-class to 2-class lie flats (as well as going to C/E+/E-)- less supply, less upgrades.

As such, I think it likely the best revenue mix is filling up the plane with Y than giving away C on upgrades by running a large C cabin. It's rather telling that the only transcons AA, UA and DL run with enhanced premium cabins consistently is JFK. AA and DL could run their enhanced domestic F products on LAX-IAD/BOS/MIA. They simply don't. I suspect that's not because it never occurred to them that there's untapped demands for $3000 roundtrip C tickets they're leaving on the floor.
eponymous_coward is offline