Originally Posted by
mooper
Is there an error in this reporting, or did I misunderstand what was expected all along? I thought there would be a nonstop flight delivered. This says that it stops in ORD.
http://www.therepublic.com/view/stor...Jersey-Flight/
Delta has, for a long time, offered BZN>MSP>EWR>MSP>BZN with 30-80 minute stops in MSP... not sure how this UA offering would be *that* much more appealing. Not having to switch planes is a minor improvement. A nonstop flight would be a major one. I hope Delta eventually adds a nonstop from JFK to compete with this.
Originally Posted by
cmn.jcs
Wow. Good catch. I found an announcement on the
BZN airport site. Here's what their news release says:
Here's what the article
mooper linked to said:
Everything matches except for the article saying there's a stop in ORD, whereas the airport is saying it's nonstop. The times seem more realistic for a nonstop (approx 4.5 hours EWR-BZN, and 4 hours coming back). Also, I just checked UA's website and the flight appears to be a nonstop.
I wonder if the writers of the article were looking at schedules prior to UA updating them? You could always do a one-stop EWR-BZN itinerary via ORD. Everything I have read has this billed as a non-stop so I don't think the stop in ORD is accurate.