FA, I posted the following in that thread:

"In response to which I posted the CTC decision on B-t-B which makes it rather clear that in the domestic situation as described, AC does not tolerate such ticketing..".

Not to mention:

"Finally, Parnel, can you please refrain from your potty language when you respond to me here. Hardly a day goes by when you don't resort to such slurs and it gets tiresome. Such name calling is definitely in breach of FT guidelines. When you lack anything substantive to say, can you do nothing more than hurl adjectives at me that would make the children on South Park blush."

The result: Within a few days of posting this request, the man called me an "AH" in a post he made.

As for ML making charges against my posts being unresearched and undocumented, and thus wishing to know my exact sources for everything I post, I can only say for the record that I spent three summers working as an agent at AC res in Toronto, so have some idea of these matters. I was also AC marketing rep at my university for two years when those posts existed. As a shareholder of the company, I read the annual and quarterly reports which discuss strategies and plans for service enhancements, and attend as many shareholder meetings as possible where -- as Rob knows first hand -- questions from the floor are fielded by AC execs. When I post on FT, and there are no immediate references available, I draw on this collected knowledge base and first hand experience with the company to develop my arguments and respond to specific questions.

Now, let's return this thread to its subject, and the propriety of a member of our Community signing back on when they have been given a Time Out.