FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - CX879 Redirected...
View Single Post
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 10:54 pm
  #15  
e39ng
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: CX
Posts: 87
Originally Posted by QRC3288
That's impressive then, I didn't realize how close to the edge of their range the 747s were flying on the SFO-HKG leg. If there isn't a full belly of cargo, then it means just the full compliment of pax/baggage alone + strong winds are enough to force a fuel stop. LAX must've been even worse. No wonder they want to switch those to 777s.
With strong headwind, the max 744 range with full pax from SFO will be around TPE. When LAX used to fly 744, their techstop usually at ICN because they could not even make it to TPE. Now LAX uses 773ER and this solves a lot of problem plus there is still some payload left for cargo even with the worst headwind.
e39ng is offline