Very diplomatic, Punki, per usual. But I don't buy it. This wasn't an isolated instance - - it was a series of posts over quite some time, many or all of which met with the same criticism. And he has sufficient command of the English language to debate ad nauseum. One simply can not make provocative and inflammatory posts and then cry foul when someone responds in kind. As evidenced by this post and the companion post, in my view he's simply starved for attention. And doc, while your peace-keeping efforts are legendary, I believe that even you "personally attacked" (i.e. disagreed with) Goldlust recently.