FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why no parachutes?
View Single Post
Old Sep 18, 2001 | 6:30 am
  #13  
Goldlust
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Copenhagen
Programs: British Airways Gold (oneWorld Emerald), Starwood Preferred Guest Platinum
Posts: 1,713
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mat123:
Then, people could simple step into their harnesses and "slide" down the zip lines to nearby buildings...</font>
Actually that is quite an idea! Would probably be even safer than the base jumbing with parachutes but the main problem for your idea is if the lower part of the building (as was the case with the WTC) is in so much devastation that sliding by it would be risky.

PG: It seems Maria is a news media person? Well, Goldlust is honored to have thought of the same as she did, and I certainly fail to see how the AA people can call it dumb. Certainly a life saver!

Goldlust is offline