Jailer - thanks for your response. As to the number of members in the council - or govenors - I would just suggest there not be so many it would be difficult to conduct discussions. As to the duties, I have no issues w/ your suggestions. Much of the remaining content in the proposal is either reiteration of existing policies or is able to be automated, so I believe it's more detailed than complicated.

LIH - I certainly understand and while I believe most of us capable of this approach, it's the remaining small percentage that consistently created the situation many believe call more more structure. If, however, the majority prefers to direct efforts toward just reinforcement of reasonable behavior, this proposal can certainly be dropped.

Doc - Yes, being a moderator would be a serious responsibility - but I believe there are good candidates in our community who would be willing to serve. The fact as I understand it is that Randy doesn't have available staff for this function. The point is to help extend the reinforcement of Randy's policies.