Originally Posted by NickB

I wholeheartedly agree.

If you try and read what I said a little more carefully, you will most probably notice that I never said what you seem to be attributing to me: I never said that BA were orwellian (this would be an utterly ridiculous statement to make, imo) nor did I say that they were dishonest either. Quite the contrary, in fact. Parochial, maybe but not dishonest. What I DID say, however, is that your post (not BA) was redefining language by adopting a peculiar definition of the term 'route', which is different from the meaning normally attributed to this term.