FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - 4 Airlines, Including UA the most Hated Companies in America
Old Nov 5, 2011 | 5:23 am
  #41  
SuperFlyBoy
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: BOM-WAW-EWR
Programs: UA*G (1K again), Sixt Plat, AC*G, LH FTL, AI*G *was*: SQ QPP01 & SK EBS/EBG, LH SEN, AA EXP, 9wPlat
Posts: 8,749
Originally Posted by SFOSpiff
Foreign airlines charge more and can provide a better experience. They also often get government subsidies, which wouldn't fly here (oops ) (I'm not talking about one-time bailouts, I mean year-after-year subsidies)
I just bought a ticket from UA, where they are charging $200+ more for an international r/t than LH is, (flight is on LH/CO segments, then all CO, required for CO/UA metal and flight numbers, which is why I bought it on .bomb) and I would consider that LH service is quite a bit better than CO intercontinental, based on the limited CO flights I have done.

AA's intercontinental service in J/F is outstanding, better than LH. (AA food much better than either LH or UA)

Originally Posted by CollegeFlyer
But, for example, I think the Indian Call Center should be shut down immediately. Numerous years of experience have shown that ICC agents are not adequately trained and have trouble handling passengers' requests or even giving passengers the correct information. No customer should have to put up with that. If a non-elite passenger calls an airline, and gets put on hold for 5-10 minutes before reaching an agent who can help them, that is treating the passenger like a nobody, and may be justifiable. But if the airline connects the passenger to an agent who is completely incapable of assisting the passnger with his/her request, and will sometimes make up rules and "facts" and lie to the passenger just to get a passenger with a complicated request off the phone, is treating the passenger like trash--and that's where I draw the line.

Of course, this is not to say that all ICC agents act in the above manner, but quite a few of them do (as I have found through my personal experience and also other UA flyers' reports). Nor do I suggest that all US call center agents are knowedgeable and well trained (but there are far fewer bad apples in the US call centers than the ICC). This indicates that whatever training and/or quality control standards being used in the ICC are woefully deficient, and the result is that customers are being actively abused on a daily basis. That's not an acceptable outcome.
I have found that the UA Indian call center to be very polite and very accurate and efficient - you haven't experienced the BD call center about a year ago, have you??

They are better than the Philippines call center as well, so now I don't mind getting connected to them in Delhi or the website support in PNQ either!
SuperFlyBoy is offline