ConcordeBoy

Since most people assume that the SR111 fire started in the electronics bay what would cargo fire suppression capability have to do with anything. Moreover, it is assumed that it was the insulation in the wiring harness conduits that burned - once again, how does cargo hold fire suppression apply.

I generally find the whole argument interesting and it stands on its own merit without bootstrapping on the SR111, using irrelevant and sensationalism themed pictures to reinforce your point and making libelous and rather snide comments about another airline. Stick to you message - it has enough juice without all of the associated baggage.