Originally Posted by
Sixth Freedom
I believe that the combination of advance purchase, Saturday night stay and nonrefundability together with the requirement for an extra GBP 500 + fare difference to D class or higher would be sufficient to ensure that either no corporates purchased these fares or that the change fee when changes were made would be sufficient to compensate BA for any downsell on tickets that were not changed.
Those would be reasons for saying that the "no change" rule is
commercially unsound and could be improved.
But where are the reasons for the suggestion that the clearly stated "no change" rule is
unfair (which is a very different concept)?