Originally Posted by
ty97
As a lawyer, you understand how contracts work. It's not about what "we allow unions in this country" to do. AA signed this contract. They didn't have to.
Personally, I think it's a pretty dumb contract to sign, but they didn't ask my opinion when they were considering it.
Agree about it being a dumb contract to sign. But to absolve the unions of responsibility is laughable. While I certainly don't know when this particular clause was signed but many such contracts are signed under the threat of a strike. Personally, I think NW's former approach of brinksmanship and allowing strikes is probably the better course of action. But airlines should never be in the position to have to make that choice.