Originally Posted by copperred

Not really. I may not care for either all that much, but I look at Continental and yes it looks like it was coded in 1996 and on top of it the back end system is a joke. There's some newish things like drop down menus on the home page, but not elsewhere. Everything else is pretty old style HTML. Very few context sensitive popups.

Neither is a winner, but if I can click one less place, that saves me a fair bit of time. That said the United mobile site is hopeless.

The route map can't tell the difference between multiple airports in one city. I don't think of them as in comparison with each other, since they both have weaknesses, but rather are they better than other sites or even other *G sites? They generally are not, but United's site at least lets me see fare classes in each bucket available.