Originally Posted by
nycr
ok i am getting a bit tired of all the absurd LH comparisons. have any of you guys actually FLOWN LH in C? with the exception of the food which is generally (but not always) better, on LH you will likely get a lie-flat (not flat bed) seat, a smaller and generally inferior ife screen, and a perfunctory and indifferent "soft product". not to mention some truly outrageous CS irrops experiences in FRA.
i would take UA new C over LH C any time. and i do.
The quote was about LH F, which IMHO is equal to UA F (or better if the UA seat is broken, which is not uncommon), even with the old LH seats. Add soft product in, and there is no reason to choose UA.