Originally Posted by
boolean64
From a hard product perspective, the new UA F may be a generation behind the asian and middle eastern airlines, but I don't find it too terribly different (or at least adequate) compared to european long-haul F.
It's better than OZ F for sure (have ridden in it), on par with old SQ F (non-suites) I'd say as well (and those planes are still flying). Hard product-wise, is it really "a generation behind" of old (majority of planes) NH or TG? Debatable.
(this is all hard product of course - soft is a different story)