FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - First Class: LH 340-300 vs. UA 767-300?
View Single Post
Old Jul 11, 2011 | 11:40 am
  #24  
eponymous_coward
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Nights
500k
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 21,286
Aside from more consistent service and meals (can't comment on wines - don't care personally) I hardly see any reason to pick LH when flying from US.
The OP is flying ex-Europe, if you check the post.

I would see some very good reasons to fly LH F instead of UA F ex-USA, though- if you have to connect in SFO/LAX/ORD/IAD to get a UA nonstop to Europe from a hub (like me, SEA-based) and then (possibly) connect AGAIN in FRA/MUC, as opposed to taking a nonstop/single connection, it would be a no-brainer for me- I'd take LH F to Europe without hesitation. The difference between a 15" screen and a somewhat better lie-flat, and a 7" screen and a worse lie-flat is not enough for me to not like the convenience of the nonstop on a longhaul, especially given the other advantages that LH has.

That being said... I'll take a connection if it times the flight better. I preferred HKG-ZRH-FRA over HKG-FRA on a trip because the LX flight was a night flight- it's easier for me to get a decent night's sleep in LX F then than during daytime on LH.

The bottom line is there is no right answer that will suit everyone. Everyone's needs are different, so pick what suits your needs.

Last edited by eponymous_coward; Jul 11, 2011 at 11:47 am
eponymous_coward is offline