FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Third runway at Hong Kong International Airport ‘going to be needed’ - Cathay Pacific
Old Jun 25, 2011, 7:24 pm
  #45  
percysmith
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,833
Originally Posted by Marco Polo
SCMP Tuesday April 26 2011 www.scmp.com
Let me tell you a story about our airport. Planning for it was somewhat delayed because a financial secretary of the early 1980s, John Bremridge, a Cathay Pacific man, said we didn't need a new one. By the time planning started again in the late 1980s there were other important things to talk about, most notably the handover of sovereignty in 1997. The airport became one of the items of discussion in these talks and the negotiators from the mainland came up with a brilliant idea. Let's just have one big delta airport, they said. We'll put it in Shenzhen, which is central for all of the delta, we'll make it as big as you want because we still have lots of room there and we'll give you people in Hong Kong every privileged access you want - your own customs and immigration channel, your own railway, your own highway, you just tell us.

No, said the Hong Kong negotiators.

Come on, talk sense, said their mainland counterparts. It makes no difference anyway. It's all going to be just one country in a few years' time and we'll have the world's biggest airport right where it's best for us all. You just tell us what you want at Shenzhen and you've got it.

No, said the Hong Kong negotiators.

And No it was. Beijing wanted the softly, softly approach to Hong Kong in the run-up to the handover. Its negotiators therefore gave in. Pointless obstinacy in Hong Kong would be accommodated for the sake of a smooth transition.

So now we have five contending airports in the delta, none of them making a proper return on investment if they are not losing buckets of money. We in Hong Kong alone spent HK$35 billion to build Chek Lap Kok, even more to build the transport connections to it.

Our special benefit from this is to have commercial aircraft blaring out their ascent phase over the harbour every few minutes because the planners forgot to tell us until after all was built that this is where the major take-off path would be. Just forgot, you know. Oversight, you see.

But back to this ballyhoo about 1,000 flights a day.
Jake van der Kamp should run out to one of the existing runways, get sucked into some plane's fan intake and remove his contribution to HK's carbon footprint (now that telling people to remove themselves from the gene pool is so passé).

What a BS piece. Even in the best case scenario - AEL and route 8 can be built to Bao'an flawlessly, HKSAR laws and rights get extended over the designated terminals, road and railway - we'd still lose the right to expand when we want to cos it's still Guangdong Provincial land.

Imagine we want to build a third runway in Bao'an and Guangdong Province tells us no cos it doesn't meet their hurdle rate/they don't feel the congestion's bad enough/we haven't bribed (ooops, given adequate "incentive") to all the people we should to say yes - we'd end up with 2-hour weekday waits on Bao'an like PVG now. Shoot Jake please.

It's the same case with CLP and its LNG terminal - which in that case, the PRC team won the argument and we're all going to have a central LNG terminal in Shenzhen. Now with Fukushima curtailing the use of nuclear power and everyone fighting to bits for LNG, let's see if we can get all the LNG we want.

Last edited by percysmith; Jun 25, 2011 at 7:36 pm
percysmith is offline