Originally Posted by
NotaCriminal
Well, then I guess if she really has worn that same ring to the airport in the past (she's posting in the comment section and mentioned the airports she's worn it through) then she was just lucky until now and TSA missed the "known weapon" on other occasions.
(Nope, still not trying to argue.
)
Yes, I would say she got lucky before.
I will also admit that the whole thing is a bit silly, but not for a reason you may suspect.
I am in a distinct minority with what I am about to write, so hold the rotten tomatoes, I understand.
I think that she should be able to wear her "ring." It is just an inanimate object. What should be illegal are the actions taken with inanimate objects. My Glock is right beside me as I type and it has not once jumped up off my desk and attempted to shoot someone.