FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Is this an example of back-to-back ticketing?
Old May 31, 2011 | 7:00 am
  #132  
ExAAerOnDL
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: ATL
Programs: DL (Diamond), HHonors (Silver)
Posts: 158
Originally Posted by Allvest
I will eat as little of the buffet food as I please if I paid for the buffet. This is becoming a farce with our para(lized) "legal" opinions
What if the buffet has a rule that says if you don't eat it, you pay for it (many do, to disincentivize waste). So you go pile too much onto your plate, and can't finish it. Should you: (a) pay for the waste, as the restaurant requires; or (b) take your plate into the bathroom and flush your waste down the toilet so they don't know you had excess leftovers? Obviously, you believe the latter is justifiable. I don't.

Originally Posted by Allvest
People. I have no idea who this guy is but I hope you aren't intimidated by his insistent reference to criminal fraud and attempts to shame good shoppers inti believing they are morally and criminally reprehensible. Anyone even try to understand ticket rules and contracts? Often I am not even given fare codes by expedia when paying for tickets. So exactly what do I agree to then?
Do you really think anyone is "initimidated" by what they read on an internet board? All I'm doing is presenting a different point of view. I don't work for an airline. I don't have any skin in the game. Do I hope to educate at least one person (clearly not you) about the reality of ticketing fraud, and what it does to the airlines? Yes. So why don't you let people decide for themselves and stop being so defensive?

Originally Posted by Allvest
There is no point arguing with someone so obsessed about their moral highness. My god, even the pope admits to be fallible ...
I guess if you don't have facts, start throwing out hyperbole.

Last edited by ExAAerOnDL; May 31, 2011 at 7:26 am
ExAAerOnDL is offline