Originally Posted by
joshwex90
I can hear where people who want "purser" to remain are coming from, but at the end of the day, it doesn't matter. ISM is much more explanatory of the job than purser. As for UA-NYC's point, if every one of the "soft" decisions went the UA way, I wouldn't care either. I'm a CO fan, and made elite with CO, and never really flew UA. I had been scared off of UA from years ago, just as many UA flyers may have been scared off of CO. Now that they've merged, the color of the carpet doesn't matter, nor does the name of the lounge, or the colors of the livery... Sure, it's nice to keep tradition, but what's more important are the hard facts, such as E+, boarding... (I'm not getting into that discussion again of which boarding scheme is better.) The point I'm trying to make is that there are certain things that aren't worth fighting as much. Something tells me if Tilton was remaining and Smisek was leaving, the carpet would stay red, "purser" would remain, etc. And I wouldn't have cared
So, you can see where people are coming from, but then discredit anyone who wants to talk about it?
And saying that you wouldn't care if the shoe were on the foot is pretty easy to say at this point.....