FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - ACLU against Iris Scanning that could replace AIT
Old May 30, 2011 | 6:30 am
  #22  
RichardKenner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
Originally Posted by SATTSO
I wouldn't assume that. The risked-based screening, whenever it is implemented and to whatever extent, may not be something you "apply" for, and it may be something people of different nations receive. We will have to wait and see.
That's tricky, though. The two most-discussed approaches are to have a high default for the level of screening and a voluntary opt-in program for less screening or have a default low-level and have a mechanism to designate people for the higher screening. But the latter, almost by definition, has to involve some form of profiling.

As to the issue of credit reports, my guess would be that the standard used would be quite different from that of somebody giving credit: I suspect that what's looked for there is the extent of the credit history, specifically how long it goes back. The dollar figures don't seem relevant.

So I'm wondering if the idea here is simply to see if one can determine that the passenger is somebody who has "stability". In other words looking at things like how far back their credit history goes, if they're employed, how long they've been at their current address, how often they fly, etc.
RichardKenner is offline