Originally Posted by Buccaneeratheart

I find all of FT very helpful, including this Delta board.

There is positive and negative sounding stuff here, but all that matters is whether any post is factual, thus helping members and visitors to continually assess whether Delta is getting better, staying the same, or getting worse.

Where things go sideways here is when opinions are share that are facially inaccurate or intended to mislead.

The best thing to do is to use the "ignore" feature so that you never see the pointless drivel...whether for or against Delta. This is who is on my ignore list:

1.) Those who have never posted on any other FT board, if they have more than 10 posts in their history.
2.) Those who have never posted anything useful to readers, instead only arguing or belittling factual posts. Or even more demeaning to themselves, just trying to start baseless arguments.
4.) Those who live in an echo chamber by never posting something that is the opposite of their usual positive or negative view.
5.) Those who by their posting history indicate that they have not flown heavily on at least 20 domestic and foreign carriers in all classes of service.
6.) Those who are inarghuably currently employed by Delta based upon having access to passenger manifests, who was given what seat, etc.

Using the "ignore" function actually contributes greatly to creating useful and civil discussion here.