Originally Posted by
StayingHomeIsBetter
I never said that DL should be forced to provide special meals.
Much of what I said could probably be interpreted as indicating that DL should see a responsibility to provide special meals. And that is the decision that DL has made.
You continue to distract from the original point... that DL, having offered the meal, has a responsibility to ensure they are delivered to the PAX who accepted DL's offer to provide the meal.
Actually you did say that, and recommended the OP contact the DOT for failing to accommodate people with disabilities.