Originally Posted by SATTSO

My only concern was this: if I hadn't called anyone on this, it would have gone unchecked. And when people can not distinguish between penetration and grazing, I wonder just how reliable a source their judgement is?

Obviously, the blogger didn't claim they were "penetrated", someone on this site claimed the blogger was penetrated - and everyone here, without any proof, would have believe it. Maybe should have waited till many people post and then pointed it out?

And if people can not distinguish, or are simply dishonest about, penetration and grazing, how should their opinion regarding pat downs and sexual assault be taken? Perhaps with a large amount of healthy skepticism, in my opinion.

My point is that some here can not seem to see the near hysteria that is sometimes (sometimes, not always) promulgated on this site. There are certainly valid concerns that are raised here, but they get lost in the lack of judgement, and tend to shy away others who may be teetering on the edge of coming down on your site.