Originally Posted by
barbell
OK, fine, the vagina, in this case, was not penetrated. You are correct, SATTSO.
Do you find it acceptable that a woman's labia were "grazed" repeatedly?
I'm not asking what SOP is.
I'm not asking what type of pat down you perform on women, because I know you don't.
I am asking, specifically, do you find it acceptable that a woman's labia were "grazed" during an administrative search of a woman having committed no crime?
My only concern was this: if I hadn't called anyone on this, it would have gone unchecked. And when people can not distinguish between penetration and grazing, I wonder just how reliable a source their judgement is?
Obviously, the blogger didn't claim they were "penetrated", someone on this site claimed the blogger was penetrated - and everyone here, without any proof, would have believe it. Maybe should have waited till many people post and then pointed it out?
And if people can not distinguish, or are simply dishonest about, penetration and grazing, how should their opinion regarding pat downs and sexual assault be taken? Perhaps with a large amount of healthy skepticism, in my opinion.
My point is that some here can not seem to see the near hysteria that is sometimes (sometimes, not always) promulgated on this site. There are certainly valid concerns that are raised here, but they get lost in the lack of judgement, and tend to shy away others who may be teetering on the edge of coming down on your site.