Originally Posted by
InkUnderNails
So, it may not be you that is responsible for the training, it may be the supervisor. Therefore the question is whether they are are held mutually responsible with the line worker for failures of the line workers for training failures of even outside suppliers such as yourself. If not, then the system I suggested earlier is in place, a system in which failures have no one ultimately responsible to the point that no serious repercussions occur for both the trainee and the trainer when there is a failure.
A system in which only the trainee is responsible for his or her own training may not be an acceptable system in terms of ultimate effectiveness, particularly when they seem to be held only marginally responsible for their failures.
Nice try to twist things around.
I want officers to be successful. I don't hold back when they are under my care and try to teach them everything I know that will help them succeed. However, I've realized over time that there is a limit to my efforts. That's just the nature of the beast.
When I have to remediate an officer, I ask myself what went wrong from the time I certified that officer to the circumstances that caused him to come back for remedial training.
Perhaps I was foolish enough to admit this concern so openly. I should have known that perfect people like you have this uncanny ability to get it right every time.
You conveniently ignored my point about seeking ways to resolve this concern by exploring an initiative to strengthen the team bond between trainers and supervisors.
Can the sun set, now, Your Perfectness?